On Wed 11/Jun/2025 09:48:01 +0200 John R Levine wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Nobody seems to be debating the utility of aggregate reports. Why is that?
Their not being actionable is similar to failure reports.
I am reasonably sure that every ESP I know would laugh at the claim that
aggregate reports aren't actionable.
Would they? Yet I found no interesting "actions" to do with DMARC reports.
Don't get me wrong, I coded an XSL stylesheet to read them better and a mail
filter o generate them. Sometimes, I even look at them (and I might learn more
from my own reports than from external ones.) Usually, though, they don't say
anything actionable.
I check log summaries and abuse responses daily. Checking DMARC, like positive
MTA-STS, is not productive. If someone were to tell us about their daily use
of aggregate reports, they might not only laugh, but write an enlightening article.
Note that I didn't say "100% useless". The same considerations apply to
failure reports.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
