On Wed 11/Jun/2025 11:58:22 +0200 John R Levine wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Their not being actionable is similar to failure reports.
I am reasonably sure that every ESP I know would laugh at the claim that
aggregate reports aren't actionable.
Would they?
There are companies whose business model largely consists of processing
aggregate reports and providing annotated summaries to paying customers. Surely
this is not news to you.
I think the wording in the I-D is sufficient to discourage having failure
reports processed by third parties.
Anyway, however closely those companies try an meet their customers needs, they
don't tell us what the effect of their effort is, for example how often their
pages are visited. I imagine that, after the initial period, this happens only
occasionally. Do they have alarms to be set in case of failure spikes? They
should be able to differenziate the mailing lists for this to make sense
(again, ditto for failure reports).
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
