Le 29/10/2014 18:40, Brian Haberman a écrit :
On 10/29/14 1:33 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 29/10/2014 18:25, Brian Haberman a écrit :
Alex,
On 10/29/14 1:17 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Sorr not the intention for surrendering anyone, just some thoughts.
I think there is a language/communication problem here.
DMM is chartered to handle the maintenance of all mobility protocols
developed within the IETF.
Do you think Mobile IPv6 needs improved implementations?
I believe *all* implementations (not just mobility protocols) could be
improved. But, I don't think that is the question you are asking...
I *think* the question you are asking is: "Are there enhancements that
can be made to the Mobile IPv6 specifications?"
Is that what you are asking?
I agree yes. Are there enhancements that can be made to the Mobile IPv6
specs in particular RFC6275, RFC3963, RFC4877, RFC6276.
I personally do not know. But as Jouni suggested, write a draft on the
enhancements you want to see and get feedback.
Brian - thank you for the invitation. Maybe I will do.
Now that the deadline passed it's for the next year. I will keep a mark
on these emails.
Alex
Regards,
Brian
Yours,
Alex
Regards,
Brian
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
