Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015, 12:29:57 schrieb Marlon Nunes:
> "The job of keeping kernel development moving isn't so much about
> "technical know-how" these days, he said. Running the core of arguably
> the world's most important operating system is now about "being trusted
> and being available. GREG (AKA GREG KROAH HARTMAN) IS THE OBVIOUS NUMBER
> TWO. HE COULD TAKE IT UP, and then there are a couple of other people.""
> Linus Torvalds
>
> Guy, that's the guy who wants by all means, kdbus in the kernel. That's
> the systemd guy in the linux kernel community.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/06/17/now_i_can_die_happy_what_linus_did
> nt_iquitei_say/
In the light of
* kdbus support is no longer compile-time optional. It is now
always built-in. However, it can still be disabled at
runtime using the kdbus=0 kernel command line setting, and
that setting may be changed to default to off, by specifying
--disable-kdbus at build-time. Note though that the kernel
command line setting has no effect if the kdbus.ko kernel
module is not installed, in which case kdbus is (obviously)
also disabled. We encourage all downstream distributions to
begin testing kdbus by adding it to the kernel images in the
development distributions, and leaving kdbus support in
systemd enabled.
Lennart Poettering: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v221
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June/033170.html
I sure hope that kernel developers still review kdbus carefully and do not
give in to any downstream pressure by distros.
I hope that kdbus will mostly be in userspace and only the parts that
absolutely need to be in kernel to speed up things will be put into the
kernel.
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
