On Fri, 8/14/15, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] Systemd Shims To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Friday, August 14, 2015, 7:26 PM On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:49:17 -0700
Go Linux <goli...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Fri, 8/14/15, T.J. Duchene <t.j.duch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DNG] Systemd Shims > To: dng@lists.dyne.org > Date: Friday, August 14, 2015, 2:47 PM >> >> > I know not everyone here agrees with me, especially Steve, and >> > that's perfectly okay. I have no problem with that at all. I just >> > don't see "System 5 pure" as realistic when planning ahead looking >> > at a maintenance standpoint when Debuan upstream is more and more >> > likely to stick with Systemd in designing their packaging. >> > >> >> Maybe we should just put Steve in charge of decontaminating all >> packages with systemd deps! > > Oh, you wouldn't want to do that. Contrary to what I wrote in another > thread about "the perfect is the enemy of the good", if *I* were in > charge of decontamination, I'd throw out whole subsystems. Gnome gone. > KDE gone. Xfce gone. Networkmanager gone. Gimp gone if it gets all > systemd on us. > -------------------------------------------- Whoa! I suggested putting you in charge of decontaminating packages not deciding inclusion/exclusion policy! Actually the suggestion was more to pull your chain than anything else (and it worked didn't it). You're quite entertaining when you get wound up. :) golinux _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
