I vote for init to be default for at least few years. Devuan might consider switching to something else few years after wheezy lts will be dead.
Meantime, all other init systems should be optional in Devuan. -- Regards Piotr On 5/3/16, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2 May 2016 21:05:18 -0400 > Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > >> Is there a summary of some sort explaining the various init systems, >> how they're put together, how they work, and especially the salient >> points on which they differ? > > I've tried. See > http://troubleshooters.com/linux/init/features_and_benefits.htm#init_system_feature_matrix > > Keep in mind these two things: > > 1) I'm an order of magnitude less knowledeable on init systems than the > average person on the supervis...@list.skarnet.org mailing list. > Those guys found several mistakes in my matrix, and I'm not sure I > corrected all of them. > > 2) Like everyone else, I have likes, dislikes and maybe an agenda. I'm > a huge fan of daemontools-inspired inits, and I have a significant > dislike of systemd. > > SteveT > > Steve Litt > April 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century > http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21 > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
