Assuming Piotr means "sysvinit" when he says "init", I agree 100%. Unless you're a Debian Dev, Lennart Poettering, or a Red Hat stockholder, there's no rush to move away from sysvinit, which has been serving us very well for what, three decades?
On Tue, 3 May 2016 08:41:37 +0200 poitr pogo <lepo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote for init to be default for at least few years. > Devuan might consider switching to something else few years after > wheezy lts will be dead. > > Meantime, all other init systems should be optional in Devuan. > > -- > Regards > Piotr > > On 5/3/16, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2 May 2016 21:05:18 -0400 > > Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > > > >> Is there a summary of some sort explaining the various init > >> systems, how they're put together, how they work, and especially > >> the salient points on which they differ? > > > > I've tried. See > > http://troubleshooters.com/linux/init/features_and_benefits.htm#init_system_feature_matrix > > > > Keep in mind these two things: > > > > 1) I'm an order of magnitude less knowledeable on init systems than > > the average person on the supervis...@list.skarnet.org mailing list. > > Those guys found several mistakes in my matrix, and I'm not sure > > I corrected all of them. > > > > 2) Like everyone else, I have likes, dislikes and maybe an agenda. > > I'm a huge fan of daemontools-inspired inits, and I have a > > significant dislike of systemd. > > > > SteveT > > > > Steve Litt > > April 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century > > http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21 > > _______________________________________________ > > Dng mailing list > > Dng@lists.dyne.org > > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > > _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
