On 14.04.2017 12:05, Jaromil wrote: > can't look deeper into it now, but well, we can consider it at least > as a reference for people preparing and fixing packages.
Can we aggree on some common naming scheme ? For now I'm just using <distname>/ as prefix (which is used by my pbuilder-based packaging tool for detecting the target distro), but I'm open for discussion. The most important point for me is having the whole tree (with all patches and debian/ subdir applied) in one tree, so I never have to cope w/ extra patchqueues anymore. Perhaps we could also move the upstream's master to a different name and use that branch for as some starting point for per-package docs, eg. branch descriptions, etc, etc (maybe as md/textile-based wiki) >> What is GUIX ? > > distro-agnostic packaging system done right (aka using a functional > language) > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Invoking-guix-package.html hmm, yet another package manager ? Why not just using docker+friends ? --mtx _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng