On 12/12/2017, Ralph Ronnquist <ralph.ronnqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Edward Bartolo wrote on 12/12/17 07:30: >> On 11/12/2017, goli...@dyne.org <goli...@dyne.org> wrote: >>> On 2017-12-11 14:06, Nate Bargmann wrote: >>>> * On 2017 11 Dec 10:13 -0600, Didier Kryn wrote: >>>>> This is the original saling argument, but it is wrong. Several persons >>>>> have already reported that Devuan's sysvinit booted faster than >>>>> Debian's systemd. >>>> >>>> It seems that as SD subsumes more and more services it would naturally >>>> slow down. Especially when one considers that the replaced services >>>> have been around for years, or even decades and are likely quite well >>>> debugged and optimized while the SD replacements are new code with a >>>> lot >>>> maturation needed. >>>> >>>> - Nate >>> >>> And since the "bugs" are often considered wontfix "features", don't >>> expect it to get any better. >>> >> >> Those are not "bugs" but new features. That is the reason for "wontfix". > > Run along, Wally. Let the grown-ups talk. >
Oh, come on. Have some sense of humour! Didn't you see the sarcasm in my comment? _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
