On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:58:33 +0200 KatolaZ <kato...@freaknet.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:30:50AM -0500, Daniel Taylor wrote: > > [cut] > > > > c) where and how would you draw the line indicating what's > > > unacceptable about systemd - in other words, what exactly do you > > > mean by "the Unix paradigm" in your comment above? > > Split out the PID 1 stuff to just the bare minimum of what needs to > > be there, organize everything else into appropriate units. > > > > This is not a trivial project, which is why nobody has taken it on > > AFAIK, but systemd must be doing something that package maintainers > > and developers want. That suggests that the way to beat them is to > > do that, only better. > > The problem is exactly there: you don't really need systemd if you > just need a reliable PID 1. What appeals systemd's enthusiasts is the > process supervision and management system. In the preceding paragraph, you perfectly described both runit and s6. SteveT Steve Litt September 2018 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
