On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 22:03:29 -0600 goli...@dyne.org wrote: > On 2019-01-01 21:37, Steve Litt wrote: > > The degree of attentiveness we now > > demand in our workplaces has been a positive trait for only a > > couple centuries, and genetics hasn't caught up. So blame is > > counterproductive. > > > > I beg to differ. It's not in the genetics. It's in how we choose to > live. The level of consciousness in parts of the world hundreds of > years BC surpasses what we are capable of today. Our individual > traits/skills/talents are the resultants of the quality of our past > actions over millennia. IOW we start a life with what what is > commensurate to who we have been. So choose wisely.
If you're referring to reincarnation, I can't comment on that. As far as the Egyptions and the Central Americans building pyramids and the like, a few had the consciousness to figure that out: I don't think there's any evidence that Joe Sixpack Maya had this knowledge. Today I bet one out of every 200 people in the world can write a useful computer program. I think assigning blame to people with subnormal attention spans is a little like assigning blame to people with bad vision. It wasn't a choice. So the people with bad vision wear glasses and don't bother reading books written with 6 point type, while those with bad attention use outlines and don't bother reading writing or documentation that rambles. No blame. SteveT Steve Litt _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
