> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 1:58 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] [dns-privacy] Verisign's RFC 9539 Experiment > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > On Jun 12, 2025, at 12:36, Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Earlier today I added text describing Verisign's RFC 9539 Experiment to > GitHub:
[SAH] [corporate URL masher snipped] > > Can you say more about this particular result? > > - The maximum QPS for DoT without session re-use was more than three orders > of magnitude lower than the maximum QPS for DNS over UDP, and almost > three orders of magnitude lower than DNS over TCP. > > It sounds like the maximum QPS for DoT was about the same as for DNS over > TCP. How much is "more than" and "almost"? [SAH] Sorry, I can't provide specific numbers. > Also, can you say why Verisign didn't measure using TCP session reuse? [SAH] It wasn't one of the goals of our experiment. Performance would certainly have been better with certain optimizations, but we wanted to better understand unoptimized behavior. Scott _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
