> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2025 8:36 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] Verisign's RFC 9539 Experiment > > > Hi Scott, > > On 12/06/2025 20:36, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > Earlier today I added text describing Verisign's RFC 9539 Experiment > > to > GitHub:
[snip] > Thanks for posting that summary. > > I do wonder though how much weight ought be attached to experiments > unless those can be replicated, so have you considered posting more > detail so that others (other TLD operators for example) could try to > do commensurate experiments? Without the ability to replicate an > experiment, it's hard to evaluate anything. > > Thanks, > S. > > PS: Having said that, encrypted DNS to a large TLD operator poses > obviously hard problems, so I'm not expecting confirmatory studies > could show hugely different results, but if we want to experiment in a > scientific manner, the ability to replicate is crucial. > > PPS: Apologies if I missed where there's more information about the > experiment somewhere else, which is entirely possible;-) [SAH] We considered sharing more. We're unable to do so because Verisign has a long-standing policy of not describing our resolution capabilities in detail. Scott _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
