hi warren,
i understand, support, and admire your intent and your
persistent effort. i wish i had your stamina.
but the ietf has spent years telling operators how important
the ietf is while treating ops as second class citizens inside
the ietf[0]. i sympathise that the latter is much harder to
address than the former; welcome to late stage capitalism. and
i confess to having given up.
but i can not resist two comments on the former, dns tech
content
o the ietf is not an unknown. the nerdy ripe dns wg members
already follow the ietf dns documents; though some at a
safe distance :). the issue may be more how to make it
efficient and productive to engage. when being a standards
professional is not one's dayjob, efficiency is key.
o your message focuses on the deleg effort to boil the ocean
yet omits the only (to me) deeply interesting work, that
of johan stenstam et alia on multi-provider dns[1]. this
is something dns operators actually need!
randy
---
[0] https://archive.psg.com/051000.ccr-ivtf.html
[1] https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/56/contributions/1223/
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options,
please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/dns-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings.
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/