On 27/07/13 19:11, Uwe Schindler wrote:
In my opinion, dnsmasq should by default (like for stateful IPv4
leases) use the lifetime specified in the dhcp-range to request the
clients to refresh this information. If it is explicitely given, of
course use the information from option6:information-refresh-time
setting.
I agree. My keyboard is clattering as we speak.
There's a bit of a complication, which is that DHCPv6
information-requests don't include the IP address of the client, so if
an information-request arrives on an interface which has more than one
address and more than one corresponding dhcp-range, then it's ambiguous
which one to use. I propose that in such a case, the range with the
smallest time will be used.
Simon.
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
