Smile On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:23:46AM -0400, imn...@gmail.com wrote: > Other thoughts (maybe dumb, but could be easily overlooked): > - An easy-ish thing to check in the source: is the counter wide enough > (16-, 32- or 64-bits)? > - What happens when max is set to 4, 16, etc.? > o Is there a maximum before the limit fails to limit? > o Does it always assign max+1 leases? > - Do each of the clients have different MAC addresses? > The answers could yield a clue. > > N > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 00:05:08 +0100 > Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > > > There's a possible difference between the number of clients and the > > number of DHCP leases, since leases can expire to be deleted by the client. > > > > Are you saying that the number of simultaneous DHCP leases increases > > without bound, or that the 513th client gets a lease? Have you checked > > the number of leases in the dnsmasq.leases file? > > > > > > Simon. > > > > On 22/05/2023 12:18, Linyih Teng wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm using dnsmasq2.89 and testing the maximum lease count of the DHCPv6 > > > server with the *dhcp-lease-max* option. > > > > > > For the testing, I'm using below configuration: > > > > > > *dhcp-lease-max* = 512 > > > *dhcp-range*=tag:pool0,2022::1,2022::1f:ffff:ffff:fffe,64,120m > > > tag-if=set:pool0,tag:intfv0 > > > > > > > > > However, when the number of clients reaches the maximum number, the > > > server still provides IPs to clients. Is this the expected behavior of > > > DHCPv6? > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Lin
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
