Awesome! This will make evaluating the caching of the HTTPS record much more easy.
Thank you, Dominik. -- Evandro Menezes > Em 7 de dez. de 2023, à(s) 21:35, Dominik Derigs <dl...@dl6er.de> escreveu: > > Hey Evandro, > > chaching of arbitrary types has been added this year in March and is > available in the latest master code (option --cache-rr). You can even > add --cache-rr=ANY to cache all records. > > See > https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=638c7c4d20004c0f320820098e29df62a27dd2a1 > and > https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=c244d92d8a3f96e3a16b53f733190faa17004ae3 > > and the corresponding man page entry: > > --cache-rr=<rrtype>[,<rrtype>...] > By default, dnsmasq caches A, AAAA, CNAME and SRV DNS record types. > This option adds other record types to the cache. The RR-type can be > given as a name such as TXT or MX or a decimal number. A single --cache- > rr option can take a comma-separated list or RR-types and more than one > --cache-rr option is allowed. Use --cache-rr=ANY to enable caching for > all RR-types. > > This feature is included in the current Pi-hole v6.0 beta testing to get > a wide testing audience (it is enabled to cache ANY in Pi-hole) but more > testing is always welcome! > > Best, > Dominik > > On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 14:05 -0600, Evandro Menezes via Dnsmasq-discuss > wrote: >> Current OSes are now using the HTTPS record to query the addresses and the >> canonical name, as well other information important to browsers, rather than >> using the A and AAAA records as they used to. >> >> In my anecdotal experience, HTTPS queries amount to over a third of the >> queries. It might make sense to cache their replies, if not to decode them >> and also populate the cache with any information for A, AAAA and CNAME the >> they may contain. >> >> Another record that is rising in usage in SVCB, primarily by browsers and >> IoT devices, to discover the DNS resolvers for DNS over HTTPS, DNS over TLS >> and DNS over QUIC. Along with HTTPS, it would be interesting to add a >> configuration option for these records. >> >> If these suggestions are considered worthwhile, I’d be glad to contribute >> patches. >> >> Cheers, >> >
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
