Would it be too much to ask the 12 people who read the draft, what 
problems they have with the draft?

What changes would be necessary to obtain support?

Thanks,

                --Dean

On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Rob Austein wrote:

> [Resending with fixed subject line, sorry for the duplication --sra]
> 
> At Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:45:25 -0400 (EDT), Dean Anderson wrote:
> > 
> > I would like to have the WG discuss taking up my draft 
> > (draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status) as a WG document.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> >             --Dean
> 
> <hat wg-co-chair="on">
> 
>   Per Dean's request, I asked those WG participants who were present
>   at the Chicago meeting two questions:
> 
>   Q1) How many had read Dean's draft?
> 
>   A1) 12 people claimed to have read Dean's draft.
> 
>   Q2) Of those who had read Dean's draft, how many supported adoption as
>       of Dean's draft as a WG document instead of
>       draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations
> 
>   A2) Nobody present in the room supported adoption of Dean's draft.
> 
>   As with any decision made at a face to face meeting this is not
>   official until confirmed on the mailing list.  So if there is anyone
>   who:
> 
>   1) Has read Dean's draft, and
> 
>   2) Supports WG adoption of Dean's draft,
> 
>   please speak up.  The chairs will assume that Dean himself has read
>   and supports his own draft.  Anybody else?
> 
>   Silence will be taken as confirmation of the tentitive decision from
>   the face to face meeting, as will off-topic postings.  So if you
>   want the WG to adopt this draft, please say so calmly and
>   distinctly.
> 
>   Cut-off for this confirmation call will be 00:00:00 UTC on 19 August
>   2007.  This is longer than I would ordinarily wait for a
>   confirmation call, but many people take holidays in August, and Dean
>   has done the right thing here by offering the WG an alternative
>   draft for consideration rather than just complaining about the draft
>   that he opposes, so I want to make sure that Dean's alternative
>   draft gets a fair chance.
> 
> </hat>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000   



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to