On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:48:51PM -0700, David W. Hankins wrote:
> In lieu of searching the minutes for them, perhaps you could repeat
> them?
Sure. They're both on slide 8 from the Chicago meeting. The first
was whether we ought to include references to RFC 1788, noting that
there were alternative proposals for how to do this. Nobody came
forward in support of this idea, and some people mentioned explicitly
that they thought it irrelevant. (My own opinion is also that it's
irrelevant, but this is a WG draft and I'm happy to be overruled.)
The other was a bit of text lifted from section 3.6 of the -anderson-
draft, which says this:
Delegate all addresses in block. Do not assume that everyone
uses ethernet.
I suggested that this was a clearer and starker statement of the
principle than was anywhere in the current WG draft, and so it might
be included. There is language in the WG draft to this effect,
however. Nobody came forward in support of this proposal either.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M2P 2A8
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 646 3304 x4110
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
