> One other issue around DO is that it was introduced to signal "understanding"
> of DNSSEC as per RFC 2535. The reaction of hypothetical 2535 only
> resolvers to DNSSECbis responses is to be explored. I vaguely remember that
> we've had this discussion of versioning the DO "bit".
It's not a issue with BIND 9.1 or BIND 9.2. They will just
ignore the DNSSEC-4035 records.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
