Thanks for the suggestion, Tony. I will add that to my tracking list for the next revision (and may email you to confirm what I have might be satisfactory). I think we probably also need to address the fact that mail servers should not use resolvers that perform DNS redirect (this was assumed but should be explicit).
Regards Jason > >> > Anyway, I think DNS rewriting is mainly for folks who also block >> > 25/TCP in- and outgoing or list the address space on the PBL and >> > similar DNSBLs, so the SMTP argument is not really valid anymore. > The draft should probably say something like that explicitly.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
