On 01/06/2012 22:03, SM wrote: > Dear Internet Engineering Steering Group, At 02:00 01-06-2012, > Olaf Kolkman wrote: >> That is almost 6 month now. Granted, we have had some comments >> coming in after the WGLC ended, all of the type that would make >> reasonable errata. Besides, that is a sign that people take the >> effort to find and read the draft, to me an indication that >> there is a need for this document to be published. > > Is the DNSOP WG still active? I am asking this question because:
Yes, the WG is still active. > (a) The WG charter lists milestones dated Sep 2007. Guilty as charged I'm afraid. On behalf of the chairs, I can only apologise to the WG for neglecting to review and update the milestones. > (b) It has been over five months since > draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11 is waiting for Write-Up. As you rightly say, progress on this this is overdue. However things have started to move - I undertook a nits review of the -11 version of the draft earlier this week and the results are now with the editors. Peter (the document shepherd) also has a few comments and will be sending them to the editors as well as summarising them on the list. At the last WG meeting, we also said we would progress one other draft: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework: This has passed the WGLC. The final nits review has been done and the draft is back with the editors for corrections. A short summary of the review was posted to the list last month. Once a new version has been submitted, it will be passed to the IESG along with the write-up (which has already been prepared). A question outstanding - and one for which I am seeking clarification - concerns the correct copyright notice. The draft is based heavily on RFC 3647, but the copyright notice for that is more restrictive than the one on this draft. Presumably this means additional copyright text - but I'm not certain of the implications (if any) of the fact that earlier versions of this draft have been published with the less restrictive copyright notice. So in summary, I'm afraid that the chairs have been somewhat bad at the housekeeping and apologise to the WG for that. However, WG is definitely alive and drafts are being progressed. Stephen _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
