I am fine with these 2 items if DNS includes DNSSEC. Maybe replacing DNS by "DNS or DNSSEC" clarify this.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 3/21/14, 7:38 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> 6. Publish documents which address DNS-related issues, by identifying >>> and >>> documenting the problem space around the issue. The group will then >>> discuss >>> these issues and decide if which group should address the solution space. >> >> >> Last sentence does not parse (and I'm not quite sure what you were >> trying to say, so unclear how to fix it). >> >> W >> > > Ooof. I obviously failed to incorporate the correct wording from my > co-chair. > > What this sentence is trying to say is: > > The group will then discuss these issues and decide if which > group should address the solution space. > > Is something like this: > dnsop will take in drafts that revolve around DNS-related issues, > and the group will discuss the problem space (via drafts) and decide: > 1. should the solution space be addressed in dnsop? > 2. If not, help decide where the work would be better > carried out and work with the appropriate ADs on this. > > > This still sounds horrible. > > > tim > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Daniel Migault Orange Labs -- Security +33 6 70 72 69 58 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
