On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hal...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nicholas Weaver <nwea...@icsi.berkeley.edu
> > wrote:
>
>> Lets assume a typical day of 1 billion external lookups for a major ISP
>> centralized resolver, and that all are verified.  Thats less 1 CPU core-day
>> to validate every DNSSEC lookup that day at 2048b keys.
>>
>
>
> Yes, I agree, but you are proposing a different DNSSEC model to the one
> they believe in.
>
> The DNS world has put all their eggs into the DNSSEC from Authoritative to
> Stub client model. They only view the Authoritative to Resolver as a
> temporary deployment hack.
>


I think even in the imagined future of validating stub resolvers, there's
still value in centralized caching; it speeds up lookup times. There's no
sense in intermediates caching bad answers, especially since it can lead to
denial of service, so there's still some value in validating centrally too.

-- 
Colm
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to