Ouch. Well so if a large body of ietf participators think wide area rdns is a
bad idea and that this option should never be recommended then we would
presumably have to say so in the document which standardized the option.
Strange.
On May 7, 2014 7:09:26 PM CEST, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:06:34PM +0200, P Vixie wrote:
>
>> If ietf documents client-subnet then it should be an FYI.
>
>Can't do that. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6360, "Conclusion of FYI
>RFC Sub-Series".
>
>A
>
>--
>Andrew Sullivan
>a...@anvilwalrusden.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>DNSOP mailing list
>DNSOP@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
