On 7 May 2014, at 13:12, P Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > Ouch. Well so if a large body of ietf participators think wide area rdns is a > bad idea and that this option should never be recommended then we would > presumably have to say so in the document which standardized the option. > Strange.
I think documenting a bad idea and including text that describes why it is bad is better than ignoring it. I'm not saying that I think edns-client-subnet is necessarily bad; I'm observing that others here believe it is. Even if we all thought it was definitively bad, given that it has been implemented I am still strongly in favour of documenting it. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
