On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > On Jun 24, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Terry Manderson <terry.mander...@icann.org> > wrote: > >> Yes, I noted the hand waving as well as a few hand-passes of problems to >> $elsewhere. > > The latter is unintentional. That is, the goal is to have a spec that does > everything it says it will.
Yup. Please point at bits where we've done this / ask what exactly we were trying to say, or, even better, provide text that answers the hand-wave. > >> I personally think this needs (much) more thinking, before coming to the >> front of the room in DNSOP - are you considering a bar session somewhere >> in Toronto to chat through this? > > That's one option, but we thought that the WG chairs wanted the consensus > discussions happening in the WG on the list. If that's not the case, we can > certainly churn the draft in private a bit and then bring it to the WG. Yup. We did already churn this some in private -- this general idea has been around for a *long* time, but DNSSEC now makes it much more feasible. There were (unsurprisingly!) a number of emails and discussions with a number of people (many of whom are listed in the contributors section. The rough idea was also presented at DNS-OARC, RIPE and the DNS track at NANOG) before we posted this version. We specifically want to get feedback / more input, which is why we published it as a draft (listing things we know need more discussion as open questions), and then asked folk to poke at it. W > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
