On Jul 16, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> There was no answer to this message. It is clear there is no standard > DNS terminology, which is often a problem when talking about the > future of the DNS. Any idea about how to change that? Do we need a > "DNS terminology" RFC? This idea has come up more than once, including an off-list conversation earlier this week about http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-dotless-terminology-harmful/ and some lengthy discussions extending years into the past about exactly what we mean by "resolver". IMO a terminology document would be tremendously useful. Next questions: is there some common view of scope, and is there a critical mass of interest to see it through? best, Suzanne _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
