Jacques, On Nov 20, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Jacques Latour <jacques.lat...@cira.ca> wrote: > I think the one big drawback for me is the loss visibility and control for > the root operators.
Lack of comprehensive statistics would indeed be an issue (I'm not going to comment on the "control" bit of your assertion), however... > As an example, DITL, what value will that have if only subset of queries make > it to root servers? The current DITL data is a subset of queries. > Will DNS-OARC have to collect logs from all these loopback authoritative > slave recursive? All? No. However, I suspect if DNS-OARC asked, they might be able to get a sufficient number of operators to volunteer their data to provide a statistically valid sample. > -1 for adoption. Is that the only reason you don't think the draft should be adopted? You are aware that some large resolver operators already do what is documented in root-loopback, right? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
