On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 06:22:01PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote a message of 32 lines which said:
> The case you describe is "consensual", because you can change it. I do not think we can have a consensual definition of "consensual" :-) If you have this choice by default, most users will not change it because they don't know how or do noteven imagine it can be changed. It is not a consensus, it is apathy. I suggest to drop the entire "Non-consensual policy-implementing resolver" paragraph from the draft. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop