> What I’m commenting does not directly answer whether the draft fulfills the > requirements for an application to the special needs registry. At some > higher level I wonder that even if these names were listed there whether the > problem of managing the identifiers will be solved. The desire to have name > spaces besides the DNS name space is definitely legitimate, the technical > barrier is how to know what space an identifier belongs to if the same syntax > is shared.
Which perhaps suggests an W3C approach instead of an IETF one ? httpoo://(ToR identifier) (oo for "over onion", although it makes a curious acronym) httpob://(name coin address) Rubens _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
