* Evan Hunt: > (It doesn't address qmail's problem, but that's a lost cause no > matter which method is chosen.)
I think it does. qmail already copes correctly with a partially cached ANY response (due to TTL mismatch between RRset), does it? The new behavior just looks like a partially cached response all the time. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
