-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/16/15 23:20, Paul Wouters wrote: > > It seems odd that two documents would be requesting an IANA action for > ".onion" ? > *** Well yes, it sounds like a mistake to me. But we can also consider it a god-given gift for people who argued against multiple TLDs in a single draft to remained focused on the actual objective(s) pursued by the draft(s).
> > Than perhaps I completely misunderstood things? How does this relate to > DNS or DNSOP if it is about issuing SSL certificates only? > *** Sorry, but I'm not the author, so I can't answer that part. == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVB7UAXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9dbsP/1XXwwZPW3wWRNmFMJVqa3jy QGf3sPSmiJSsWoGMv0X5E3dQCcLn8c8Th58myYsOFJSKGhMTekhxgBySWCayscJG FSHFjwk++UTwRgO0vy/M9/oJbCjGdpOh/fegZrVeeOhR21/I9Q3kzBzd+QL9WdV4 uwowqKIHBpjUv3rk0JKIQFrAepm5YQJ4uoVF1cdq6q8nwT8G2mxl5t4gBvuiqW8Z IGHUaxnOnmFhr2HT/jnGWXD9ksY1Rk8cFifqGYLzToksPBsKCQwr4z1xwE/lAgP7 XwhISW96Zf6FbyiUFVMHpYoGhPGBd6Fz/e+NoThNccUzqx1/TaEg4WC0MuuhyXvs 8c75gVsKLf4rPUPoNTXkU18DU2kMqoO8b+KjuYSzAXQHRHlgbI3519To0OtjKerU /lYtdGJ3ylCZh8wOFGTV/J5+vUXL+L6S6haqmtPoOcSLFBQH0ziouwRywdS7v2YF X6Ir7esAgugQMwS/ZalJyexnEqu1M2AVcbXCu6pQ2J77pRnRDS2Dl5mg6NJPVjeS 5p+SnOYP+NfpUSHaZl3RtfIudXIwVTRUpsD9F5e21jKpPTniwp24si/ZfmZd/K/E 5pBCfXOoN5uIRqdO123rdTvUtSpO+jRrPhTUN7k53tsvip0pppbtRWQ7S/bYOuDd sMNliOkUv0Td6Q3r7vKc =QfoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
