-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/17/15 12:58, David Conrad wrote: > > I doubt arguments of this nature are particular helpful. > *** I feel obliged to reflect this to you.
> My personal observation is that one of the problems with your draft > *** Maybe you should direct comments on the P2PNames draft to the P2PNames conversation. Your comment suggests that the Introduction section of the draft did not convince you, yet you didn't say anything about it, which demonstrates the lack of interest in moving it forward. Now, as I said before, Jake and Alec's draft offers an opportunity to do actual work on one of the P2PNames pTLDs without the distraction of such argument you put forward. Can we please do that? == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVCFGZXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9SI0QAJbC4Xp0q/DpP/f/0NC4b2ef yo5oVXKiAAztb/6ED5OUGaV/KIWIV2GP2pwI1rxK8FrTWge2kajFLAmTXCcY3aGN fh/jdY08XgPqO5lFXfMa6hCq5vXQVJareig8tgOl0k18DckjN6f+v2njgN6fvnUj 2l+FPSl6GxtVzLGLmly/qvRJU27Xi35UoTIj87xVGXTHpXBm9v4bkpz7vwyR4HYl nBzIkV7ZteEd3kjGu9KMiOw80FEq/bI8hQii92p4jRw1FOTHiFvF+8qW1MzBRTg0 iYbYyKEZpSxw+7q9U6vzvXzPCuD2iCPLG6VAbjB56OtGdO8Cq23Q8LUUpeUeb1wx gzupSHuS0WbsOYxb4VRqVlrsb6Aw0/0PQ2zWyS/MgdKlgXY/mRRjf+6awwMl1iaW L1bpqvvvwWmRALRRV3bP1k8F2wOroP5A67kSoUaXs+ZSHqzxdzeARIQ6GD66Lst/ YvggjZxrav6Z1QhtVqS9xTczt16lvCSbn8lxnOWSn+inNSmEV7lPuhuyWZh/bkGh Lr0ENl0MULn/+zuY+7S//9AxtyTjWVsUOxrsEn+bmR6T9kr91fX9wIpKOHOllVHL en+NGf1qXy8863rxZwZicW+TUKbs2m9dKyYWGebhjBVJ2XronFMz3aAWxTRIyIX8 yMg26gCiIiO9Mv1wH1/u =2MAs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
