On 03/17/2015 03:55 PM, Alec Muffett wrote: > The reason I am not more emphatic in this matter is that the question > as-phrased is essentially about *that* document, not this one, and I do > not speak for or on behalf of Christian Grothoff, author of that document. > > Thus, I shall cc: Christian into this message, in case he wishes to > describe his perspective of that document with respect to this one. It's pretty simple. The 2nd draft doesn't obsolete or replace the first one, it's a Lex Facebook, just like reserving ".local" was a Lex Apple. I'm not generally against those at all, but I personally dislike that IETF passes things quickly if they are backed by multi-billion dollar companies, while putting up high hurdles (and delays are obstacles) for proposals that are just as sound but do not come with such support. Corporatocracy at its best.
Now, if Alec thinks there is anything in his draft that is not covered in our original draft, I'm sure we can merge them as there is nothing in the Lex Facebook on the technical side that we would disagree with. So one could view this as the political-compromise draft: the multistakeholder process is designed to deadlock on almost everything, except for what the corporations need (as they represent a sufficient number of the "stakeholders"). Anyway, that's my perspective, Jake is more optimistic ;-).
0xE29FC3CC.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
