On 5/13/15, 11:12 AM, "Tony Finch" <d...@dotat.at> wrote:

>Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote:
>>
>> Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs for their
>> customers?
>
>ISPs should delegate the relevant part of the IPv6 reverse DNS tree to the
>customer, so the customer can provision PTR records as required.

This is already addressed in the draft.
draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07 section 2.3.3 and 2.4, and in the
recommendations.

Lee


>
>Tony.
>-- 
>f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
>Biscay: West or southwest 4 or 5, increasing 6 or 7. Moderate, becoming
>rough
>later. Rain or showers. Moderate or good.
>


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to