On 5/13/15, 11:12 AM, "Tony Finch" <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
>Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote: >> >> Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs for their >> customers? > >ISPs should delegate the relevant part of the IPv6 reverse DNS tree to the >customer, so the customer can provision PTR records as required. This is already addressed in the draft. draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07 section 2.3.3 and 2.4, and in the recommendations. Lee > >Tony. >-- >f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ >Biscay: West or southwest 4 or 5, increasing 6 or 7. Moderate, becoming >rough >later. Rain or showers. Moderate or good. > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop