> Em 26/05/2015, à(s) 15:50:000, Lyman Chapin <ly...@interisle.net> escreveu: > > Hi Suzanne - > >> HOME/CORP/MAIL (draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-02): >> >> * This is the most controversial of the RFC 6761 drafts and the one most >> driven by policy concerns > > It is not driven by policy concerns; it is driven by operational concerns, > and I have heard almost no one in the WG discussion argue that these three > names should *not* be withdrawn/reserved (and I say "almost" just to be safe, > as I haven't checked thoroughly enough to omit it).
I'm curious about one of those TLDs: MAIL. Besides dotless "mail", which seems to hit the root at very high rate (lack of negative caching) and shouldn't be ever allowed to exist, and a few meaningful labels like local.mail*, I can't recall the reasoning for being concerned with <something-here>.mail. No matter whether one thinks the responsibility to deal with .MAIL lies with, what are the issues that people see with it ? Rubens * From the first JAS namespace collision analysis still published at http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-name-collision-05aug13/pdf3WmZlrH3fo.pdf although not anymore published at original point of publication _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
