> Em 26/05/2015, à(s) 18:18:000, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> escreveu: > >> I'm curious about one of those TLDs: MAIL. Besides dotless "mail", which >> seems to hit >> the root at very high rate (lack of negative caching) and shouldn't be ever >> allowed to >> exist, and a few meaningful labels like local.mail*, I can't recall the >> reasoning for >> being concerned with <something-here>.mail. >> >> No matter whether one thinks the responsibility to deal with .MAIL lies >> with, what are >> the issues that people see with it ? > > Queries for dotless mail already provide plenty of issues. See RFC > 7085.
RFC 7085 mentions MX queries to other existing TLDs, not MAIL. And I would be equally concerned with MX requests for dotless MAIL than with A/AAAA/SRV requests for dotless MAIL. Saying there is a concern with dotless MAIL is an easy sell, my question was on issues with not-dotless MAIL. Rubens _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
