On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:43:16AM -0400, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote a message of 518 lines which said:
> The point of this document is not to make normative requirements. But it does: 'Best practice is that "Every Internet-reachable host should have a name"'. > It's simply to enumerate the set of options that ISPs have. But it does not limit itself to that. > The point is that the mere fact that you do not think this is useful > isn't a reason not to publish it. The working group already got > consensus that this work was useful when we adopted it; the question > now is, are there _mistakes_ in the document that need to be > corrected prior to publication, I don't think we have the same view of what is a Working Group Last Call. IMHO, there is nothing restricting a working group to just fix mistakes. The Last Call is also, as its name says, the opportunity to check the general issues. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
