Ray Bellis writes: > On 14/12/2016 20:14, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > > Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something > > like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa). > > <hat partly-on>
Which hat? > > It's not considered user-friendly enough. > > The historic meaning of ARPA is considered by some to be problematic in > the consumer space that Homenet is targeting. > > It's unfortunate that it's the only top-level name under IAB control. > The current expansion of the acronym to "Address and Routing Parameter > Area" is itself not a good fit for this somewhat more generic use case. But is there a technical argument? Or is this just a well a believe it doesn't fit perfectly. Does it really matter how the identifier is called? jaap _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop