On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:23:10 -0500 "Allan Liska" <al...@allan.org> wrote: > On 12/20/2016 at 12:31 AM, "ac" wrote: > > If you wish to consider a physical analog, there may be a general > > principle that one should not interfere with postal mail, but this > is challeged by the existence of the unabomber or the anthrax attacks. > In your example, you still require a court order, you do not have > standing to make a decision to intervene yourself. > in DNS, it is much more subtle, it is about honesty, morality and > ethics. +++ > Your nonsense is starting to get annoying. The whole reason that RPZ > exists is because there are a whole bunch of dishonest, unethical and > immoral people out there registering bad domains and attacking my > users. Tools like RPZ help me defend organizations against these <snip>
It is not really an argument to say just because someone else has no ethics it is also okay for me not to have ethics. This is now becoming off topic and not related to this draft. Andre _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
