On Feb 1, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It appears to me that requesting an insecure delegation is the right thing >> to do, as a "technical use". We have, so far, been very careful in what we >> ask for. If ICANN does not agree, then we can discuss other options. > > I agree.
I'm confused. The .ALT TLD is expected to be used for non-DNS name lookups. So isn't a secure denial of existence exactly what we want for .ALT? What is the utility in having an un-signed delegation?
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
