In article <cadywq+hxxbhhcupyvyt9i9kfwm7o_m10vdnmnst6sdoboog...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by >DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
I think we should adopt it as a starting point, but it needs a lot of work before it can be published. In particular, I agree with Paul W that ANAME has to work with offline signing, since a lot of us have no plans to do online signing, ever. I don't necessarily agree with his way to make that happen. Perhaps it could be more like CNAME and return the A/AAAA records with the original names and signatures. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
