> -----Original Message----- > From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wouters > > I kind of disagree. >
Hi Paul, Thanks for the feedback! > > We are adding something to DNS that's not just a new RRTYPE. It > requires code changes and has a deployment and long tail. If the > only result is that anti-spammers are no longer checking reverse > PTR records, we end up with a feature in DNS that has no use, and > the anti-spammers using another method to determine "inferior" > IP addresses. DNS will be the only party left with some legacy > complication. > I don't believe the need for this has anything to do with anti- spammers. We've had several requests for this feature (as I have to believe have other ISP's). > > I would feel much better if there would be some real use csases > to justify adding special code to DNS that will instantly become > obsolete. > Just think of all the scripts out there today for IPv4 alone which expand and work around the limitations of $GENERATE (or equivalent), why not standardize this in an AXFR-able manner? Thanks, John > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER: This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
