On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I strongly believe that any work on cleaning up DNS protocol and/or rewriting
RFC1034/RFC1035 and associated document would need a new WG with tightly
defined charter.
Hence, I will not request or I won’t support adopting my
deprecating-obsolete-rr-types as a WG document - it might become one of the
first documents for new WG, or it might end up as individual submission. While
this work might be considered as “protocol maintenance”, I think it is bigger
then simple protocol maintenance.
I agree. If this is a task worth doing, do it in a new WG.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
