Definitely. I didn’t mean to rewrite 1:1, but take existing content and do m:n including splitting and combining existing RFCs into new document(s).
Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC > On 27 Mar 2018, at 18:19, Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote: > > > >> On 27 March 2018 at 03:49, Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote: >> >> Again, from experience from dnsext, I would strongly suggest that any work >> in this area is split into CHANGE documents and REWRITE documents, with >> strict scope. Documents rewriting existing RFCs while adding more stuff at >> the same time tend to not reach the finish line. >> > Does this include combining documents? For example, it would probably make > sense to combine some of the clarifications documents into any rewrite of > 1034/1035. >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
