On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Jim Reid <j...@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> > > > On 28 Mar 2018, at 18:02, Phillip Hallam-Baker <ph...@hallambaker.com> > wrote: > > ... long rant snipped ... > > Well that is how I plan to go forward at any rate. > > Good for you. Please come back to the IETF once you've figured it all out > and have running, interoperable code. > > http://mathmesh.com/ https://github.com/hallambaker/Mathematical-Mesh I always base my protocol observations on actual code. Had you actually read my post rather than felt threatened by it, you would have seen that I said I had code at the very start. The sub-library in question is https://github.com/hallambaker/Mathematical-Mesh/tree/master/Libraries/Goedel.Discovery The discovery mechanism is described in: http://mathmesh.com/Documents/draft-hallambaker-json-web-service.html As I said, that is the direction I am headed in. Oh and since I have been in the IETF for 25 years, I take exception to folk using exclusionary language or representing themselves as authorities on process etc. as a way to shut down discussion of technical contributions.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
