It might be useful to compare this to labels like _tcp that appear in SRV records and elsewhere. Those are not listed in the SUDN registry. I think that this also doesn't make sense to list there. It's an interesting question, of course, but I think we have a precedent that answers is.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:53 AM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > > > > The authors are in disagreement - RFC6761 talks about "Special-Use Domain > > *Names*", not "Special-Use Domain *Labels*", but Stuart has said that it > > wasn't intended to be only for TLDs / pseudo-TLDs / things starting at > the > > top of the tree. > > Hmm. I think that if RFC 6761 were supposed to cover arbitrary labels then > it ought to have said something about localhost as a subdomain. > > > So, please, *clearly* state if you think that this: > > A: is a SUN > > B: is not a SUN > > KSK-sentinel feels like a new kind of thing, but I guess it has a lot in > common with let-localhost-be-localhost. So I think our answer should be > the same for both of them. > > My initial reaction was (B), but after I compared with localhost I think > (A) is probably the right answer. > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > Humber, Thames, Dover, East Wight: Northerly 5 or 6. Slight or moderate. > Fog > patches. Moderate, occasionally very poor. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
