> On Aug 21, 2018, at 3:30 PM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote:
> 
> this, joyfully, is a very good question.
> 
> Tom Pusateri wrote:
> ....
>> Ok, so as Vladimír said, getting back to DHCP…
>> 
>> 1. You obviously don’t need a DoH URI option for DHCP. 2. You’re
>> comfortable with DNS over UDP/53 as long as DNS Cookies are present
>> and using the existing DHCP DNS options 3. You seem happy with the
>> Android approach of just trying DoT with the IP address learned via
>> standard DHCP DNS options
>> 
>> Why do you care about additional DHCP options?
> 
> in my previous explaination as to the security model i follow, i noted that 
> the network paths to my dhcp server and my rdns servers were different, and 
> that in the dhcp case i have far more observability and control than in the 
> rdns case.
> 
> it should follow therefore that i do NOT want to use UDP/53 + Cookies unless 
> there is no alternative. DoT will be preferred. (DTLS or SCTP would be even 
> better, but i'm only picking from items now-on-menu.)

Since you can already do DoT today without an additional DHCP DNS option and 
adding that option will indisputably also come with a DoH URI option too, I 
would think you would be arguing against any new DHCP options for consistency.

Tom

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to