Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:

> This is equally an argument for doing DNS over DTLS. This would give
> similar performance to DoH over QUIC.

If I understand it correctly, DTLS leaves MTU and fragmentation up to the
application protocol. The DNS has horrible packet size problems, so it
needs a lot more help than DTLS provides. QUIC is much better.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
The Minch: Westerly 4 or 5, backing southwesterly 5 or 6, occasionally 7 later
in north. Rough in far north and in far south, otherwise slight or moderate.
Occasional drizzle. Good, occasionally poor.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to