Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > This is equally an argument for doing DNS over DTLS. This would give > similar performance to DoH over QUIC.
If I understand it correctly, DTLS leaves MTU and fragmentation up to the application protocol. The DNS has horrible packet size problems, so it needs a lot more help than DTLS provides. QUIC is much better. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ The Minch: Westerly 4 or 5, backing southwesterly 5 or 6, occasionally 7 later in north. Rough in far north and in far south, otherwise slight or moderate. Occasional drizzle. Good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
